Greetings Members and Readers,
Watching the news, such as it is, and trying to figure out what in the hell is happening in our country is a debilitating chore. The state of our union is uncomfortable at best and is very dangerous for us, in fact.
There are people in power right now in government that are trying to send a clear message to us that is falling upon deaf ears. It is frustrating and painful to endure this dance of self analysis and to respond to the answers that we are getting.
There are several reasons that we are still at each others throats and they are valid in some contexts and ridiculous in others, because we have ALL been duped. We are going to try and make some sense of all this without attacking the left or the right and without fomenting more anger, in hopes that these words fall on more receptive, reasonable ears.
“Philanthropic” is a word that means: to promote the welfare of others by donating money or other aide to good causes and the needy. We think that there is no argument that philanthropy is right and just. To help others that offer the recipient benefits immediately to end their need temporarily is good, especially coupled with design in aide that will teach recipient skills which will will end their need permanently. “Give a man a fish, solve hunger for a day, teach a man to fish, solve hunger for life”. We do not think that the likes of Hamas qualify as the needy.
Such gifts, in the best scenario, should be offered with no caveats but one, and that might be to “pay it forward” as time and skill allows. To state our position clearly, it is that thoughtful charitable efforts benefit everyone involved and are good and proper for all involved.
But what if in the gift giving, the giver becomes insolvent over time and he, the giver too, becomes equally needy in some realm or another? That seems to be the case today in the USA. We have heard many times that “one has to take care of himself before he can sustain efforts to take care of others’.
We also need to consider the type of gifts offered and the “how” to offer such gifts in a gentle and respectful manner so as to preserve the recipients personal dignity. Sometimes that is a tough hill to climb. Teaching skills, methods, technology, science, techniques and cleanliness is one way to accomplish dignity because those gifts infer the need for the recipient’s contribution as a critical element to insure the success of such efforts with sustained results.
There are more questions to address as well. What is the result if we teach our enemies skills that they can use against us down the road? Or, are our gifts given as a sham that can be used for other than stated purposes that benefit the creed of another, like sending money for the purchase of condoms and that money is used, after being greedily parsed out, for the purchase of munitions that can be used against us. Have we purposely given funds to ultimately feather the nests of some while we expect those remaining funds to be used against us. Such initiative and caveats are literally insane especially when we do not have any funds to be given for any reason.
Why would we send funding all over the world to teach the lethargy of the woke/DEI or to further homosexuality, or to offer answers for the hormonally distressed with more hormones, surgeries, or hormone blockers that they can not afford. We are making the needy more needy and dependent or more lethargic when streamlined endeavor is really the answer. We are giving monies away that we do not have to further misery. We are treating the symptoms of illness rather than targeting our gifts to cure disease. Most importantly, we are giving gifts that are harmful to the recipient that give no answer to “NEED” that stealthily insert silent caveats meant to undermine the strength and solvency of our own country and the world: to what benefit and to what end?
Over the last century and before, we have learned to give money as foreign aide to achieve reactions that benefit us, ourselves and our country. It is embarrassing to make such a statement but it is true. We are buying favor with more and more worthless dollars and the bad news is that the world has figured out that they can smile, cow tow, gyrate and offer thanks, make promises and then abscond with the money to purchase large homes, cars, yachts and land elsewhere to our chagrin, yet we continue ad infinitum. Not only do we perpetrate this charade internationally, we do it right here at home.
It is not a party line illness, the left and the right continue this repetitious debacle knowingly to feather their nests or position at the expense of the initiative itself. And it is all rationalized emotionally as the right thing to do as we further insult the world, weaken our stature as a country, enlarge the dependent by offering more free stuff and stifling the need for personal initiative, all the while borrowing more and more to cement our undeclared bankruptcy that is quite evident.
The discoveries by DOGE should be seen as an effort to curtail these diabolical trends toward total insolvency rather than an attack upon the left. The only result of our efforts to curtail and stop such insanity is not a political statement, it is a necessary obligation we have to ourselves and the world that we do so.
The people that will benefit from these efforts, after an expected period of pain are: ALL OF US!
A great example in all of these measures is the Ukraine. To deny Zelensky money for a war that can not be won without some degree of appreciation shown and without a reciprocal agreement where the USA can be made “whole” can not be considered selfish. It is going to accomplish several results: We cover our butts to be repaid for our efforts to help Ukraine and fend off Putin or we bow out and let the chips fall where they may saving billions that we do not have to give for a lost cause or we force Europe to unite and help Ukraine which is in their best interest on that continent. Europe should have been doing this since the war began. How ever this all shakes out, it is not and never has been the responsibility of a pompous bankrupt nation 3000 miles away to meddle in such a war. We can put Putin in his place in many other ways if necessary.
Trump is right. Becoming a mining partner with Ukraine is a good idea: We are put in a position to recover Biden’s losses there, we will show a presence in Ukraine that will deter further Russian aggression, and the killing will stop as will the expense of war and we, as a nation will gather needed minerals that otherwise will be used against us down the road. DUH!
These initiatives trump all other considerations AND the winners will be ALL THE PEOPLES OF THE WORLD.
Be Aware: We must gather up the courage to heal ourselves in the name of ourselves rather than always seeking a partisan divide. The survival of our country and the world is a NON-PARTISAN ISSUE.
Beware: The instant resistance instigated by Soros and perpetrated by his bought and paid for, emotional and ignorant minions, is nothing more than international treachery and treason where those that participate are not singing songs of freedom for right and just causes, they are unknowingly aiding and abetting the destruction of our country for a hundred dollar bill that is nearly worthless and the lark of a momentary feeling of self. The results the next day is one more littered avenue somewhere in New York City, a city that is having issues just to find the funds to clean up the litter.
Note: not one of them could tell us why they were there!
Soros is not man of philanthropy, he is a sick rich bitch that gets his jollies stirring the pot of divisiveness and dissension with his paid flunkies, just to prove that he can.
TPP
Recent Comments